Tuesday, December 30, 2014

The Story of Brahmopadesham Ceremony

The entire history of Hinduism is hidden in the word ‘Brahmopadesham’

As soon as their son becomes 7 year old, most Hindu Brāhmin parents begin to plan an elaborate and expensive Brahmopadesham Ceremony. Some people refer to this ancient ritual as Yajnopavītam, and others call it Upanayana. Colloquially this ritual is also known as “Sūtra (Thread) Ceremony.” It is a ritual, which most Hindu men of “upper classes” have been through as boys.

Most parents put their boys through this ceremony simply because it is the religious requirement and family tradition passed on from generation to generation for almost three thousand years. This article is an attempt to make this ritual more meaningful for parents who are planning for this ceremony.

The Upanishads: During the period of 900-500 B.C. some Kshatriya intellectuals within the fold of Sanātana Dharma, whom we shall henceforth refer to as Upanishadists, created and promoted the doctrines of immortal Brahman the Supreme, and Yoga of detachment and selfless Karma. The texts explaining these doctrines were known as the Upanishads. Most authorities believe that the word Upanishad means, “being seated near.” The student (Shishya) sat close to his Guru and engaged him in confidential discourses on the Upanishadic doctrines.

The Secret Doctrines: The apparent goal of the Upanishadic doctrines was to enable the student to attain immortality of Brahman (Brahmajnāna) by means of practice of Yoga of detachment and Nishkama (selfless) Karma. Their secret goal, however, was to overthrow decadent Sanātana Dharma, also known as Brahmavāda (Dharma of Brahma, Brāhmanism), which was based on two distinct doctrines: The Gunas (Qualities, ropes) of Prakriti and the Law of Karma. Yoga of detachment helped one to transcend the Gunas of Prakriti, and Yoga of Nishkama Karma helped one to transcend the Law of Karma. Because the secret goal of the Upanishadic doctrines was to overthrow Brāhmanism, they were known as Secret Doctrines (Rahasyam). The reason why Upanishadists wanted to overthrow Brāhmanism was because it had steadily decayed between 1500-900 B.C. due to abuse of Yajnas (sacrificial rites performed to thank nature gods for their benevolence), and Varna Dharma (hierarchical class-designated duties) based on unequal distribution of three Gunas in different classes. Brāhmanism’s decay threw the society into a great deal of turmoil, and this resulted in revolt and birth of several heterodox Dharmas such as Buddhism and Jainism.

Brahman: Upanishadists believed in an all-pervading, all-containing, eternal, immortal, immutable, indestructible Super Divinity known as Brahman the Supreme. They declared Brahman as Sat –Real, and the material world (Prakriti) as Asat (Unreal). The term Brahmopadesham (Brahman + Upadesha) meant, teaching the knowledge (Jnāna) of immortal Brahman (=Brahmajnāna). When Upanishadists said just the word ‘Jnāna’ (knowledge), they meant Brahmajnāna; and when they said ‘Ajnāna’ (Ignorance) or ‘Tamas’ (darkness), they meant lack of Brahmajnāna.

Secret purpose: However, Brahman the Supreme had a secret purpose. It was designed to replace Brahma (Prakriti) the Supreme of Brāhmanism and its nature gods:

Mundaka Upanishad 2:6:2-3: Whatever there is –the whole world (perishable Prakriti)- when gone forth from immortal Brahman, trembles in its breath. That Brahman is a great terror, like a drawn sword. Those who know It become immortal. From terror of Brahman fire burns; from terror the Sun burns; from terror Indra, Vayu and Yama, as the fifth, run away!   

Furthermore, Upanishadists declared the Vedas as inferior knowledge; Varna Dharma as a sign of Ignorance of Brahman; Yajnas as evil, and priests as conceited fools.      

Ātman (Self): Upanishadists believed that a part of all-pervading immortal Brahman the Supreme resided in all living beings as Ātman, the life essence. Brahman and Ātman were one and the same (Self). They expressed this view by means of the Sūtra: Tat Tvam Asi (That you are). Here the word Tat stood for Brahman. They claimed that the Gunas (ropes) of Prakriti held Ātman a prisoner in the body just as hunter’s net traps a bird. Thus Ātman, now bound by the Gunas to the perishable body, became ignorant of the fact that It and Brahman were one and the same. Furthermore, they claimed that Ātman was bound by both good and bad Karmaphalam (fruits of deeds), which condemned It to Samsāra –to be born on earth again to enjoy one’s Punyam (good Karmaphalam) or to suffer one’s Pāpam (bad Karmaphalam).    

Yoga: Upanishadists believed that for one’s Ātman to rejoin Brahman and realize Its oneness with It, one must resort to Yoga and cut off all attachments (Gunas, ropes) to material things (money, people, power, etc.) and give up desire for fruits of deeds (Karmaphalam). In Yoga one steadies one’s bewildered and restless Mind (Manas) by yoking it to one’s Wisdom (Buddhi), and withdraws one’s Senses (Indriyāni, eyes, ears, nose, taste and touch) from sense objects (money, people, power, etc.). In practice, the term ‘withdrawing the senses’ meant giving up desire for, attachment to and possessiveness of all material things.

Self-realization: When one succeeds in Yoga of detachment and selfless Karma, one intuitively becomes aware of the fact that he is Brahman, as expressed in the Sūtra: Aham Brahmāsmi! I am Brahman! Such a person is said to be a Brahmajnāni, a Self-realized person or knower of Brahman. Since Brahman has everything and desires nothing, It is the seat of Sukham (Bliss). A Self-realized person enjoys Bliss of Brahman here on earth and Brahmanirvāna hereafter. Brahmanirvāna means Ātman, released from all bondage with this material world, merges with Brahman never to suffer from Samsāra, the cycle of death and birth, hereafter.  

Mode of communication: Upanishadic seers were brilliant intellectuals capable of direct and coherent communication. However, because of the secret nature of their mission, they often used metaphors, double entendre, enigmatic parables, secret codes and Sūtras to communicate their views and secret motives to their students as well as peers. As we will discover soon, unless one knows the history and deeper meaning of the words and phrases they used in the Upanishads nearly 2750 years ago, one would interpret them literally and miss their true intent and spirit, or even reach wrong conclusions.  

Sūtra: The literal meaning of this word is thread. It is a highly compressed statement, which, like a thread holding gems, holds a few code words. One must know the inner meanings of the code words in order to understand the message hidden in it.

Recruitment: Brahman-realized Gurus, residing in Ashrams, carefully selected their students for the purpose of Brahmopadesham: Mundaka Upanishad: 1:2:12-13: In order to gain the knowledge of Brahman, let the Shishya approach a Guru who is learned and dwells entirely in Brahman. To that pupil who has approached him respectfully, whose thoughts are not troubled by any desire, and who has obtained perfect peace, the wise teacher truly told that knowledge of Brahman.

BG: 4:34: Seek that enlightenment by prostrating, by questioning and by service. The wise seers with insight into the True will instruct you that knowledge.

The Ceremony: The selected student underwent Dīksha (initiation), which we know today as Brahmopadesham Ceremony. During the ceremony, the student sat very close to the Guru who uttered three Sūtras in the ear of his student, and asked him to repeat them. These Sūtras were in the form of a request to the Guru to teach him knowledge of Brahman. They were the three most profound Sūtras of the Upanishads:
Asato Ma Sat Gamaya (Lead me from Asat –Prakriti- to Sat -Brahman);
Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya (From Ignorance of Brahman to Its knowledge);
Mrityor Ma Amritam Gamaya (from Samsāra to Brahmanirvāna).

As a symbol of having uttered these three Sūtras and begun the study, the Guru put around his neck and chest a cotton garland consisting of three threads (Sūtra). After this ceremony, the boy became a Brahmachārin –one who walked the path of immortal Brahman. His goal was to escape from Samsāra –the perpetual cycle of birth and death on earth as per the Law of Karma- and become immortal –Chiranjīvi. His method to achieve this goal was Yoga.  

Guru Kula: The student then became part of his Guru’s family (Guru Kula). He served the Guru and his wife by faithfully performing their household chores. The Guru and Shishya regularly engaged each other in confidential discourses by mean of which the Guru passed on to his Shishya the Secret Doctrines of Brahman and Yoga. The Shishya stayed with the Guru, sometimes for several years, until the Guru was thoroughly satisfied that he had truly realized Brahman.

The Vedānta: To neutralize the threat posed by the Upanishads, Brāhmanic scribes haphazardly interpolated huge amount of pro-Brāhmanic stuff into these texts and declared them as Shruti (“that which is heard”), which could be heard only by the upper classes if a Brāhmin chose to utter them. They classified knowledge of Brahman and Yoga as Jnāna Kānda (knowledge branch) of Brāhmanism, and decreed that only after one had mastered Karma Kānda (ritual branch) one was qualified to learn it. They declared these incoherent, self-contradicting and almost incomprehensible texts as the Vedānta, the end part of the Vedas. Commentaries on these texts by various “authorities” are even more bizarre, as they indulged in much fanciful imagination in interpreting enigmatic words, phrases and metaphors. The Upanishads disappeared entirely, but we can still find their doctrines scattered haphazardly here and there in the Vedānta and the Bhagavad Gita-Upanishad. They renamed Brahmopadesham as Yajnopavītam (Yajna+ Upavītam). Most likely this is a corrupted form of the compound word Yajnopavista, meaning sitting at or engaged in Yajna.

Current form of Brahmopadesham Ceremony: The mode of this ceremony differs widely from one community to another. However, in its core form it is as follows: The father of the boy strips him of all clothes except for his loin cloth (symbolizing renunciation of worldly things in the spirit of Yoga), seats him very close to him (“Upanishad”), or on his lap (“Upanayana,” being within eye range), puts a cloth over both of their heads (as a symbol of revealing the Secret Doctrine of Brahman), utters the most sacred Mantra of the Brāhmanism –Gāyatri- Rig Veda: 3:62:10 in his ear, and asks him to repeat it:

Om! Bhur Buvah Svah…Tat Savitur Varenyam; Bhargo Devasya Dheemahi, Dhiyoyonah Prachodayat.
May we attain that excellent glory of (Sun god) Savitur, so may he stimulate our understanding.
After this ceremony, the boy is declared to be a Brahmachārin and Dvija (twice born). Then his elders bless him, “Become Chiranjīvi (Immortal).”
Old versus New: Although the current form of Brahmopadesham ceremony superficially resembles the one Upanishadic Gurus performed on their students during the Dīksha about 2,750 years ago, there are several significant difference:
1. Following the Upanishadic revolution, Brāhmanism created its own Super God known as Divine Purusha (Divine Person) and appointed Him over Brahman. Its scribes interpolated the verses promoting Purusha into the Upanishads as well as the Rig Veda. RV: Purusha Sūkta: 10:90:2-3: This Purusha is all that yet has been and all that is to be. Lord of immortality (Brahman), which waxes greater still by (sacrificial) food; so mighty is his greatness; yea, greater than this is Purusha. Also Mundaka Up: 2:1:10.
2. Brāhmanism declared Purusha as Sat, and claimed that knowledge of Brahman was merely the medium through which one gains knowledge of Purusha (Mundaka Up: 1:2:13).  
            3. Around 1st century B.C., followers of Bhāgavata Dharma, worshipers of Vāsudeva, God of gods, decided to end the internecine conflict between Brāhmanism and Upanishadism. They merged the identity of Vāsudeva with Lord Krishna of the Upanishadic Gita, and declared Him as Parameshwara (Super Lord), God of gods. They incorporated both Brāhmanic Super God Purusha and Upanishadic Brahman the Supreme into the body of Vāsudeva-Krishna, and thus they both ceased to exist from that point in history: BG: 10:12: Arjuna: You are Supreme Brahman, the Supreme Abode, the Supreme Purifier, the Eternal, Divine Purusha, the Primeval Deity, the Unborn, the Omnipresent.
4. Brāhmanism neutralized the Upanishadic Sūtra (Secret Code) Asato Ma Sat Gamaya; Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya; Mrityor Ma Amritam Gamaya by turning it into a Abhyāroha of Pavamāna verses of Yajurveda uttered at Yajna ceremony, and declared that the meaning of all three Sūtras was the same: Lead me from death to immortality.   
 5. They replaced it with Gāyatri Mantra of Rig Veda, greatly embellished and glorified by Brāhmanism as goddess Gāyatri. This Mantra has absolutely nothing to do with the Upanishadic Secret Doctrines of Brahman the Supreme and Yoga of detachment and Nishkāma Karma. It addresses one of many Vedic Sun gods (Ādityas), whom Upanishadists overthrew along with Prakriti in the course of Upanishadic revolution.
5. In fact, the Gāyatri is not a Sūtra (Secret Code) at all, but a simple prayer, as it contains no secret words whatsoever. So, covering the heads of the father and son with a cloth to symbolize secrecy, and adorning the student with cotton Sūtra is utterly meaningless.
6. So, the inescapable conclusion is that Brahmopadesham Ceremony, as conducted today is a farce. Its only goal is for priests to make money, and for parents to thoughtlessly fulfill their religious and traditional obligation. Of course, it is a grand occasion for a get-together of family and friends.    


The Only Useful Wisdom of Hinduism

All Hindus I know take great pride in their Faith. When I ask them, “Can you tell me what is the essential wisdom of Hinduism?” all of them look up and down and sideward.

Three sacred texts: The three most sacred texts of Hinduism are the Vedas, the Vedanta (containing some Upanishadic stuff) and the Bhagavad Gita.

The Only Wisdom: The fact is the ONLY WISDOM, which can be distilled from all of them that is useful in our daily life in the 21st century, is in the form of a caveat:

When man becomes obsessed with people, wealth, power and status, his Manas (Mind) becomes disconnected from his Buddhi (Wisdom), -the seat of memory of his duty and lessons learned, knowledge of the world, insight into his own and other’s behavior, judgment about a situation and right course of action, moral values regarding right and wrong, and noble virtues such as generosity, kindness, honesty, integrity, fearlessness, and righteousness. Thus deprived of wisdom, his actions become destructive to him and others.

Upanishadic origin: Upanishadic seers, the intellectuals of ancient India, developed this wisdom in response to obsession of the upper classes with money, power, land, and people (just as the modern day politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen in India do). In order to gain these, they corrupted the selfless Yajnas into selfish Yajnas. This resulted in the steady decay of Sanatana Dharma and rise of heterodox Dharmas such as Jainism, Buddhism, Ajivika and Lokayata.

Suppression: The vested interests suppressed this Upanishadic wisdom and continued their nefarious activities. Several centuries later an Upanishadic poet restated this wisdom once again, though somewhat awkwardly, in the Bhagavad Gita shlokas 2:62-63.

Grain versus Chaff: This is truly the only timeless grain of wisdom in the huge pile of Hindu texts. The rest is just useless chaff consisting of mindless rituals. Unfortunately, most staunch Hindus practice only the ritualistic part of Hinduism.

Stomach dictates all actions: Why do Hindu Swamis and Gurus not teach Hindus the only timeless wisdom of Hinduism? Well, you know the answer:

1. They themselves have become obsessed with wealth, power, land and people, and thus have become ignorant themselves.

2. There is no money in teaching people wisdom.  

The fact is the stomach, not the brain, dictates all actions. Kanaka Daasa put is succinctly: Ellaroo maaduvudu hottegaagi!    




   

Saturday, December 20, 2014

What These Twelve Great Men Did Not Know About The Bhagavad Gita

The other day I received an email with quotations of 12 great men praising the Bhagavad Gita: Mahatma Gandhi, Aldous Huxley, Ralph W. Emerson, Carl G. Jung, Hermann Hesse, Henry D. Thoreau, Robert Oppenheimer, Thomas Merton, Bronson Alcott, Albert Einstein, George Harrison, and T.S. Eliot.

It is obvious that all of them found some shlokas in the Bhagavad Gita (BG) that appealed to them immensely. 

However, the fact is none of the above mentioned 12 great thinkers, not to mention all the great Swamis and Acharyas of India who wrote long and inscrutable commentaries, knew the historical context of the shlokas they referred to in their writings, and therefore, they did not know their true intent and spirit. They simply interpreted them according to their fanciful imagination.

I can comment on all twelve quotes of the twelve great men mentioned above, but I do not want to bore the reader. Let me give you just one example of misinterpretation of shlokas in the BG by Carl Jung due to his ignorance of their true context.

Carl G. Jung: “Bhagavad Gita is a remarkable psychotherapeutic session on the battlefield. The idea that man is like unto an inverted tree seems to have been current in bygone ages. This correlation can be discerned by what expresses in chapter fifteen of Bhagavad Gita.”

The inverted tree Carl Jung was referring to is found in the following 3 and ½ shlokas in the Chapter Fifteen:

BG: 15:1-4: They speak of an imperishable Ashvattha tree with roots above and branches below. Its leaves are the metrical hymns (Chandas); he who knows them is the knower of the Vedas. Below and above spread its branches; sense objects are its buds; and below in the world of men stretch forth the roots, engendering action. Its form is not here perceived as such, neither its end, nor its origin, nor its existence. Having chopped asunder this firm-rooted Ashvattha with the strong axe of non-attachment, that goal should be sought for, going whither, they do not return again.

Obviously, not knowing the historical context of the above shlokas, Dr. Jung mistook the inverted Ashvattha tree in these shlokas as a metaphor for perverted man needing psychotherapy. This is an example of interpreting shlokas according to one’s fanciful imagination. We cannot entirely blame him for it. Every Hindu Acharya and Swami, claiming to be an authority on the BG, has interpreted these shlokas in even more bizarre fashion. Just read any commentary on these 3 and ½ shlokas and see if it makes any sense.

Here is the historical background of these shlokas: These 3 and ½ shlokas contain secret codes and metaphors, which are part of the Upanishadic revolution to overthrow perverted Brahmanism top to bottom.

Why? Well, during the period of 1000-500 B.C. the nexus of Brahmins and Kshatriyas corrupted Sanatana Dharma by converting selfless Yajnas into selfish Yajnas (Kamya Karma), performed against the ordinances of scriptures, in which they sacrificed all kinds of animals including cows (BG: 16:12-17, 24). Their goal was to gain Karmaphalam (fruits of Yajna as per the Law of Karma) to attain heaven after death, and to enjoy wealth, power and higher status in their next birth.

The original purpose of Yajnas: The original purpose of these Yajnas was merely for people and Vedic nature gods (Indra, Agni, etc.) to cherish each other as explained in shlokas BG: 3:10-12:

Having created mankind in the beginning together with Yajna, the Prajapati (Brahma) said: “By this (quid pro quo system known as the Wheel of Yajna) you shall propagate; this shall be the milch cow of your desires. Cherish the Devas (nature gods Indra, Varuna, Agni, etc.). Thus cherishing one another, you shall reap the supreme good (of the entire society). Cherished by Yajna, the Devas shall bestow the enjoyment you desire.”

By means of these Yajnas people thanked gods for their benevolence; and gods, pleased by their gratitude, bestowed on them even more bounties such as rains.

Ritualists became thieves: Ritualists were not supposed to have Sankalpa (intention, design, 6:2) to gain Karmaphalam for themselves by means of these Yajnas. If they did they became thieves, as explained in 3:12-14, 16:

3:12-14, 16: A thief verily is he who enjoys what Devas gave them without returning them anything. (Those who perform Yajna to gain Karmaphalam for themselves are thieves) The good that eat the remains of Yajna (as the symbol of gratitude for rains and other bounties) are freed from all sins (they do not earn any Papam). But the sinful ones who cook food (burn food in sacrifice) only for themselves (to earn Karmaphalam for themselves), they verily eat sin (they earn Papam). From food beings become, from rain is food produced; from Yajna rain proceeds; and Yajna is born of Karma. (This is quid pro quo system was known as the Wheel of Yajna). He who does not follow on earth the Wheel of Yajna thus revolving, sinful of life, and rejoicing in the senses he lives in vain.

Upper classes disregarded these injunctions: Disregarding these ordinances of scriptures, the nexus of Brahmins and Kshatriyas indulged in corrupt Yajnas as explained in 2:42-43:

These ignorant ones (Brahmin and Kshatriya ritualists), delighting in the flowery words of the Vedas say that there is nothing other than this (going to heaven and being born again on earth to enjoy Karmaphalam)…Desire-driven, they hold attainment of heaven (hereafter) as the goal of Karmaphalam, performing specialized grandiose Yajnas (such as Vajapeya, Rajasuya, and Ashvamedha) for pleasure and lordship (in their next birth).   

Decay of Dharma and rise of heterodox Dharmas: This is how the upper two classes of Brahmanism abused their powers and corrupted Sanatana Dharma. There arose a great anti-Brahmanism revolt in India resulting in the birth and rise of several heterodox Dharmas such as Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivika and Lokayata.

Upanishadists launch a revolution: Some disgusted intellectuals (MaNishinah, Upanishadists) within the fold of Brahmanism used the Brahmanic poem ‘Arjuna Vishada’ (the 77-shloka long Original Gita) as the vehicle to overthrow Brahmanism top to bottom, and replace it with Upanishadism based on the doctrines of Brahman (all-pervading Spirit) and Yoga of detachment.

They used metaphors and secret codes, such as the ones below, to overthrow every single aspect of Brahmanism.

First Upanishadists describe the perverted Brahmanism:

1. The imperishable Ashvattha tree represents the once-noble Shashvata (Eternal) or Sanatana (Ancient) Dharma.

2. Its roots are above and branches are below. This Dharma has been turned upside down due to corruption of Yajnas.  

3. Its leaves are Chandas (metric hymns) and he who knows them is knower of the Vedas. Priests well versed in the metric hymns of ritual-oriented Vedas uttered them at Yajnas with the goal of gaining Karmaphalam (2:42).

4. Below and above spread its branches, nourished by the Gunas. The Gunas of Prakriti (Sattva, Rajas and Tamas) are the forces, which promote desire for, attachment to and possessiveness of sense objects (heaven, power, wealth, etc., BG: 3:28, 29, 37-40). The branches (BG: 2: 41) going above desire heaven hereafter, and those going below seek wealth, power and enjoyment here on earth in the next birth.

5. Sense objects (heaven, wealth, power, status) are its buds. Buds are metaphor for material things ritualists craved for as induced by their Gunas.   

6. And below in the world of men stretch forth the roots, engendering Karma (Yajna). Desire-driven Yajnas are rooted in this perverted Dharma.  

7. Its form is not perceived as such. This once-noble Dharma has become so corrupted that it is now totally unrecognizable.

8. (One can perceive) neither its end, nor its origin, nor (even) its existence. This Dharma has ceased to exist in its original form, and no one knows its original purpose, and its end is not in sight. In other words, this on-going perverted Dharma is beyond repair.  

Then Upanishadists offer a permanent solution –chop it down: Now what did Upanishadic revolutionaries want to do with this rotten upside down tree of Brahmanism? Well, you guessed it: They wanted to chop it down and end the whole farce of earning Karmaphalam by means of corrupt Yajnas, going to heaven and being born again on this miserable earth to enjoy it.

9. Having chopped asunder this firm-rooted Ashvattha tree (perverted Brahmanism) with the strong axe of non-attachment (Yoga of detachment), that Goal (Brahmanirvana) should be sought for, going whither they do not return again. The Goal of Yoga of detachment was to overcome the force of the Gunas of Prakriti (which promoted selfishness) and the Law of Karma (which earned Karmaphalam in Yajna), the very foundation of Brahmanism, and attain Brahmanirvana –permanent merger of Atman with Brahman, thus forever ending the perpetual cycle of birth and death (Samsara) on this miserable world.

Now you know the true intent and spirit of these 3 and ½ shlokas. Obviously, the great Carl Jung knew nothing about the above historical context of these shlokas when he referred to the “inverted tree” as representing man. This, in reality, is the case with the rest of the great men as well.

Today it has become fashionable for Indians in all walks of life –politicians, ministers, Acharyas, Swamis, Gurus, judges, bureaucrats– to praise the Bhagavad Gita to the skies and recommend it to everyone knowing absolutely nothing about the true intent and spirit of the shlokas in it. If you ask them, “Can you tell me one specific thing you like about the Bhagavad Gita?” they are not able to give a sensible answer.

Absolute Ignorance is Absolute Bliss.